
Readers, ever since I earned my masters degree this past December I've become quite the joiner. Contrary to my past group-related behavior--a sort of flaky, half-interested hoverering--it is currently my habit to compulsively join any professional organization that catches my eye. The American Library Association? Yes! The Society of American Archivists? OK! The Freedom to Read Foundation? Sure! The Art Libraries Society of North America? Why not? It's really addictive, this joining business (and kind of expensive too--although it's one of those things that you can talk yourself into pretty easily by saying that it's integral to your career and "participating in the profession").
The benefits of this kind of mass subscription are pretty good: I get to list them on my resume under the impressive-sounding "Memberships & Organizations" heading, plus I usually get access to some job-related service the organization may provide (like listservs), I can join a round table discussion group or regional chapter, and, most of the time, these types of groups will publish a journal, which you automatically get a subscription to as a member. Oh, boy, do I love journal subscriptions! I currently get Ohio Valley History and The Filson (both from being a Filson Historical Society member), Library Journal, Art Documentation (from ARLIS), American Archivist (SAA), and soon: The Progressive Librarian!
That last one is something I'm particularly excited about, as they are a fairly radical, pro-union, pro-humanist, pro-F-the-establishment lefty group of librarians who aren't interested in being pushed around by The Man or inviting Starbucks to set up shop in our public libraries. According to their statement of purpose:
"Progressive Librarians Guild was formed in New York City on January 1990 by a group of librarians concerned with our profession's rapid drift into dubious alliances with business and the information industry, and into complacent acceptance of service to an unquestioned political, economic and cultural status quo."
Hmm, I think I'm pretty much on board with that. It's a little jarring, though, to see some library related organization rail against the word neutrality like they do:
"Members of PLG do not accept the sterile notion of the neutrality of librarianship, and we strongly oppose the commodification of information which turns the 'information commons' into privatized, commercialized zones. We will help to dissect the implications of these powerful trends, and fight their anti-democratic tendencies."
One assumes they are referring to being against neutrality as a way of being complicit with corporate/government control of information, and not as being against the unbiased dissemination of information no matter what our own personal feelings/beliefs (i.e. letting people know where the Ann Coulter books are, even though we know she's a giant D-bag. 'cause I agree with that kind of neutrality...). Anyway, I'm pretty sure that's what they're getting at, so I sent my $20 check off this afternoon to the PLG. I'm also totally making an iron-on transfer of that bad-ass eagle logo above, which I found on their website, and will be affixing to a t-shirt in the near future (along with a handwritten source citation, 'natch)



